Peculiarities of the use of feature films in interactive learning

Vol. 32 Iss. 2 pp. 145152 | St. Petersburg State Institute of Psychology and Social Work | ISSN: 1993-8101

Abstract

This article focuses on the opportunities and benefits of using cinema as an interactive learning tool. The author examines a number of principles that allow to maximize the benefits of film-training and give some practical guidelines for carrying out this type of interactive instruction. In the present article cinema is considered as a communicative system in which mechanisms of socio-psychological influence operate, and the nature of the language of the movie allows to enhance this influence. Analyzing the features of the perception of cinema, the author gives a number of examples pointing to the suggestive means of the film, and the metaphorical language of the movie allows to intensify this effect. Moreover, the article focuses on the ability of cinema training to form certain concepts that help in the assimilation of scientific theory. The article gives a brief description of the author's development of a training project on the topic of time management using feature films. The author considers the predicted results of work in the framework of this project.

Keywords

archetype, group discussion, interactive teaching methods, myth, identification, concept, mechanisms of socio-psychological influence

Citation

Citation — Harvard Notation

References

  1. 100 luchshikh filmov dlya menedzherov [100 best films for managers]. Top-Manager, 2007, 1 (67). 318 p. (In Russian).
  2. Allen D. Kak podderzhvat dela v poryadke. Printsipy polnotsennoy zhizni bez stressa [How to keep things in order. Principles of full-life without stress] Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber Publ., 2010. 400 p. (In Russian).
  3. Arabov Yu. N. Kinematograf i teoriya vospriyatiya: Uchebnoye posobiye [Cinema and the theory of perception: Manual]. Moscow: all-Russian State Institute of Cinematography Publ., 2003. 106 p. (In Russian).
  4. Barkova A.L. Ot korolya Lira k tovarishchu Sukhovu. Sudba mifologicheskogo klishe v khudozhestvennom myshlenii [From King Lear to comrade Sukhov. The fate of the mythological cliché in artistic thinking]. Chelovek – Human, 1998, (2), pp. 154-170 (in Russian).
  5. Volkova D. E. Orlov A.B., Orlova N.A. Znak, metafora, simvol – metodologiya subyektnosti [Sign, metaphor, symbol – methodology of subjectivity].Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki – Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 2010, 7 (3), pp. 89–119 (in Russian).
  6. Guzeyev V.V., Ostapenko A.A. Usvoyeniye znzniy I osvoyeniye umeniy: skhodstvo I razlichiye protsessov [Assimilation of knowledge and development of skills: similarityand difference of processes]. Narodnoye obrazovaniye – Public Education, 2009, (4), pp. 131-138 (in Russian).
  7. Kino i glubinnaya psikhologiya: Yungianskiy vzglyad [Cinema and depth psychology: a Jungian view]. Мoscow: Moscow Association of Analitical Psychology Publ., 2010. 304 p. (In Russian).
  8. Kubryakova Ye. (Ed.) Kratkiy slovar kognitivnykh terminov [A concise dictionary of cognitive terms]. Мoscow: Moscow State University Publ., 1996. 245 p. (In Russian).
  9. Kempbell G. Geroy s tysyachyu litsami: Mif. Arkhetip. Bessoznztelnoye. [A hero with a thousand faces: Myth. Archetype. Unconscious]. St. Petersburg: Sofiya Publ., 1997. 336 p. (In Russian).
  10. Lotman Yu. M. Semiotika kino i problem kinoestetiki [Semiotics of cinema and problems of cinema aesthetics]. Tallin: Eesti Raamat Publ., 1973. 138 p. (In Russian). Available at: http://lib.ru/CINEMA/kinolit/LOTMAN/kinoestetika.txt (accessed 28.10.2019).
  11. Lotman Yu. M. , Tsivyan Yu. G. Dialog s ekranom [Dialogue with the screen]. Tallin: Aleksandra Publ., 1994.216 p. (In Russian).
  12. Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty: Slovar russkoy kultury [Constants: Dictionary of Russian culture] (3rd ed.). Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt Publ., 2004. 992 p. (In Russian).
  13. Trus A.A. Kinotrening: Tekhnologiya i metodika videoobsuzhdeniya [Film training: Technology and methodology of video reasoning]. St. Petersburg: Rech Publ., 2011. 191 p. (In Russian).
  14. Yampolskiy M.B. Pamyat Tiresiya. Intertekstualnost i kinematograf [Memory of Tiresiy. Intertextuality and cinema]. Мoscow: Kultura Publ.,1993. 464 p. (In Russian).