Social manipulation in internet memes: identification problems

Vol. 34 Iss. 2 pp. 14–22 | St. Petersburg State Institute of Psychology and Social Work | ISSN: 1993-8101
2020 • Issue 2 • Volume 34Research in applied psychology

PDF Download

Abstract

The features of the concept "social manipulation" are analyzed. It is substantiated that most of the features are formulated with methodological errors, namely a distinct subjectivism in identification by mixing the particular (optional) and the general (attributive), interpretation of the general as unique. It is postulated that it is advisable to abandon the features of intentional impacts, their secrecy from the addressee, the personal benefit of an initiator, causing harm, skill in applying techniques, maintaining the illusion of choice, engaging the sphere of the unconscious, establishing control. A new understanding of social manipulation based on the concept of heuristic judgments developed by D. Kahneman and A. Tversky is proposed At the same time, social manipulations are considered as attempts of informational influence, expressed in stimulating other people to simplified, overly generalized and distorted judgments by bringing to the fore the atypical, non-essential or non-existent features of the phenomena under discussion, while ignoring the features necessary for balanced judgments. The manipulative potential of Internet memes is assessed. The article describes the procedures and results of the experiment on the material of Internet memes, which substantiates the redundancy of using many features in identifying social manipulations.

Structurally, the article consists of three components: substantiation of the need for a new look at social manipulation and the formation of its essence, description of Internet memes as a kind of “platform” for intensive manipulative influence on computer network users, as well as presentation of the procedures and results of the experiment to identify the key signs of social manipulation on the material of Internet news memes.

Keywords

social manipulation, indications of social manipulation, Internet memes, Internet news memes, judgment heuristics, substitution, perception of social manipulation, experimental study

Citation

Citation — Harvard Notation

References

  1. Aronson E. The Social Animal. New York: Worth Publishers, 2008. 430 p. (10th ed.) (Rus. ed: Aronson E. Obshchestvennoye zhivotnoye: Vvedeniye v sotsialnuyu psikhologiyu. St. Petersburg: Praym-Yevroznak Publ., 2006. 416 p.).
  2. Denisov M.A., Khorosheva N.V. Problema opredeleniya termina “manipulirovaniye’ v rabotakh rossiyskikh issledovateley [The problem of defining the term”manipulation” in the works of Russian researchers]. Politicheskaya lingvistika – Political linguistics, 2015, 2 (52), pp. 94-101 (in Russian).
  3. Dotsenko Ye.L. Psikhologiya manipulyatsii: fenomeny, mekhanizmy i zashchita [Psychology of manipulation: phenomena, mechanisms and protection]. Мoscow: CheRo Yurayt Publ., 2000. 342 p. (In Russian).
  4. Kaneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013. 499 p. (Rus. ed.: Kaneman D. Dumay medlenno….reshay bystro. Мoscow: АST Publ., 2019. 653 p).
  5. Lysenko Ye.N. Internet-memy v kommunikatsii molodezhi [Internet-memes in youth communication] Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsiologiya – Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University. Series: Sociolog, 2017, 10 (4), pp. 410-424 (in Russian).
  6. Maksimova S.A. Novostnoy mem v internet-diskurse: spetsifika zhanra. Aktualnyye problemy lingvistiki i literaturovedeniya [News mem in Internet-discourse: genre specifics. Actual problems of linguistics and literary studies]. Materialy V (XIX) Mezhdunarodnoy konferetsii molodykh uchenykh [Proc. of the V (XIX) International Conference of Young Scientists]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University, 2018, pp.73-74 (in Russian).
  7. Nikitina O.A., Gudkova O.A., Zander F. Internet-memes kak multimodalnyy fenomen nemetskoyazychnogo internet-diskursa [Internet-memes as multimodal phenomenon of German-language internet-discourse]. Yazyk i kultura – Language and culture, 2018, (43), pp. 74-87 (in Russian).
  8. Popova Ye.S. Reklamnyy tekst i problem manipulyatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. filolog. nauk [Advertising text and problems of manipulation: Cand.Sc. (Philology) dissertation abstract]. Yekaterinburg, 2005, 27 p. (In Russian).
  9. Puyu Yu. V Traditsionnyy vzglyad na problemu manipulyatsii – aktualen li on v sovremennom diskurse [The traditional view of the problem of manipulation – is it relevant in modern discourse]. Filosofiya prava – Philosophy of Law, 2014, 2(63), pp. 34-37 (in Russian).
  10. Sergeyeva Z.N. K voprosu ob eksplikatsii soderzhaniya ponyatiya “sotsialnoye manipulirovaniye” [On the question of explication of the concept content “social manipulation”]. Idei i ideally – Ideas and Ideals, 2010, 2(4), pp. 107-115 (in Rusian).
  11. Toffler E. The Third Wave: The Classic Study of Tomorrow. New York: Morrow, 1980. 544 p . (Rus.ed.: Toffler E. Tretya volna. Мoscow: АST Publ., 2009. 795 p.).
  12. Miltner K.M. Internet memes. In J. Burgess, T. Poell & A. Marwick (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Social Media (pp. 412-428). New York: Sage, 2018.
  13. Pratkanis A.R. The attitude heuristic and selective fact identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1988, 27 ( 3), pp. 257-263.
  14. Shaffer M.J. The availability heuristic and inference to the best explanation. Logos & Episteme, 2019, 10 (4), pp. 409-432.
  15. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science. New Series, 1974, 185, pp. 1124-1131.
  16. Vis B. Heuristics and political elites’ judgment and decision-making. Political Studies Review, 2019, 17 (1), pp. 41-52.