Socialization of representatives of generation Z in the digital environment and its impact on education

Vol. 33 Iss. 1 pp. 115121 | St. Petersburg State Institute of Psychology and Social Work | ISSN: 1993-8101

Abstract

The socialization of representatives of the Z generation is largely going on in the digital space. Digital socialization determines a special way of constructing the life world and the specific nature of assimilation of ethical values among these young people. Socialization in a digital environment also contributes to the development of anomie. The development of anomie among representatives of generation Z leads to deviant behavior, which manifests itself in unmotivated aggression, insulting other communication participants in the digital environment. Along with anomie and deviation, the digital socialization of Generation Z is also characterized by opposing trends in institutionalizing the ethics of digital interaction. Practices of unethical behavior stimulate the appearance on the Internet of discussions about the framework of permissible and unacceptable behavior. This spontaneous discourse of digital ethics is extremely interesting from both a theoretical and a practical point of view. Based on the natural views of individuals about ethical standards, it is possible to formulate a code of ethical behavior in digital space. Such a code would not be coercive, but the very fact of its existence would influence the behavior of individuals.

The studied features of generation Z can be extremely useful for improving education. Understanding the specifics of the life world of these young people will allow them to develop more interesting courses and teaching methods. Knowledge of the mechanisms of the genesis of ethical norms in the digital environment can be used for more effective transmit of socially constructive norms of behavior and ethical values among young people.

Keywords

generation Z, norms, ethics, anomie, digital environment

Citation

Citation — Harvard Notation

References

  1. Volkova N. V., Chiker V. A. Osobennosti karyernoy motivatsii v kontekste teorii pokoleniy: rezultaty empiricheskogo issledovaniya [Features of career motivation in the context of generation theory: results of an empirical study]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Menedzhment – Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Management, 2016, (4). pp. 79-105 (in Russian).
  2. Zvereva E.A. Osobennosti mediapotrebleniya "pokoleniya y" i "pokoleniya z" [Features of the media consumption of generation “Y” and generation “Z”]. Socialno-gumanitarnyye znaniya – Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 2018, (8), pp. 205-216 (in Russian).
  3. Ivanov D.V. Glem-kapitalizm: obshhestvo potrebleniya v XXI veke [Glem-capitalizm: society of consumption in the 21st century]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii – Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2011, 14(5), pp. 9-28 (in Russian).
  4. Maletin S.S. Osobennosti potrebitelskogo povedeniya pokoleniya Z [Features of consumer behavior of generation Z]. Rossiyskoye predprinimatelstvo – Russian Enterpreneurship, 2017, 18 (21), pp. 347-360 (in Russian).
  5. Mamina R.I., Tolstikova I.I. Phygital pokoleniye v usloviyakh svobodnoy globalnoy kommunikatsii [Phygital generation in conditions of free global communication]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal otkrytykh informatsionnykh tekhnologiy – International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 2020, 8(1), pp. 34-41 (in Russian).
  6. Osintseva N.V., Muratova I.A. Transformatsiya eticheskikh tsennostey v usloviyakh razvitiya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy [Transformation of ethical values in the context of digital technologies development]. Manuskript – Manuscript, 2020, 13 (1), pp. 171-175 (in Russian).
  7. Pletnev A.V. Razvitiye sotsialnoy anomii kak faktor izmeneniya pedagogicheskikh praktik v usloviyakh virtualiziruyushchegosya obshchestva [Development of social anomie as a factor of changing pedagogical practices in a virtualizing society]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Ministerstva Vnutrennikh Del Rossi – Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University of Ministry of Internal Affairs, 2018, 3 (79), pp. 190-193 (in Russian).
  8. Tolstikova I.I. Infoetika svobodnoy globalnoy kommunikatsii [Infoethics of free global communication]. Informatsionnoye obshchestvo: obrazovaniye, nauka, kultura i tekhnologii budushchego – Information Society: Education, Science, Culture and Technologies of the Future. 2018, (2), pp. 217-222 (in Russian).
  9. Agnew R. Building on the Foundation of General Strain Theory: Specifying the Types of Strain Most Likely to Lead to Crime and Delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 2001, 38(4), pp. 319-361.
  10. Ballantine J. H., Spade J. Z. Schools and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education. New York: SAGE Publ. Inc., 2014. 528 p.
  11. Benincasa L. Democratic education and the 'strategy of material obstacles': a pedagogical approach to the enforcement of traffic rules in a Greek town. Ethnography and Education, 2016, 11(1), pp. 1-20.
  12. Crawford C. M., Hardy S. L. Dynamic Principles of Professional Development: Essential Elements of Effective Teacher Preparation. Maryland: Rowman, 2017. 140 p.
  13. Strauss W., Howe N. The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy. New York: Broadway Books, 1997. 400 p.
  14. Hughes L. A., Schaible L. M., Gibbs B. R. Economic Dominance, the “American Dream,” and Homicide: A Cross‐National Test of Institutional Anomie Theory. Sociological Inquiry, 2014, 85(1), pp.100-128.
  15. Laruelle M., Beyond Putin: Russia’s Generations Y and Z. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, 2019 (579), pp.1- 6.
  16. Lythcott-Haims J. How to raise an adult. Spokane: Griffin. 2016. 368 p.
  17. Meet Generation Z: Forget Everything You Learned About Millennials. Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/sparksandhoney/generation-z-final-june-17/5-A_generation_with_ disposable_ income5Gen (accessed 22.03.2020).
  18. Messner S. F., Rosenfeld R. Crime and the American Dream (5th ed.) Andover. Wadsworth. 2013. 176 p.
  19. Murad, R., Hussin, S., Yusof, R., Miserom, S. F., & Yaacob, M. H. A Conceptual Foundation for Smart Education Driven by Gen Z. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2019, 9(5), pp. 1022–1029.
  20. Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon, 2001, 9 (5), pp. 1-6.
  21. Teymoori A., Jetten J., Bastian B., Ariyanto A., Autin F., Ayub N., et al. Revisiting the Measurement of Anomie. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(7), pp. 1-27.
  22. Tapscott D. Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. 2008. 384 p.
  23. Tulgan B. Not Everyone Gets A Trophy: How to Manage the Millennials (18th ed.) San Francisco: Jossey Bass. 2016. 208 p.